Try it for yourself
004Recognising fundamental rights

A fundamental right protects freedom, not force.

Four terms appear to describe rights. One names the fundamental right sought here: freedom of expression. Question 004 separates liberty from imposing your will by force.

About 4 min readReviewed: 19 October 2026
AI-generated scene of a woman speaking into a microphone at a community meeting.
Basic LawArticle 5
Expressing a view does not require physical power. AI-generated illustration.
The short answer

Freedom of expression is the fundamental right.

Article 5 protects expressing and sharing opinions. Gun ownership, the rule of force and vigilante justice are not equivalent fundamental rights.

Try it for yourselfExam question · No. 004
Which right is one of the fundamental rights in Germany?

Choose one answer. Your result stays on this page only.

Having a right is more than being able to act.

At a public meeting, you can say you disagree with a proposed road. This protection does not depend on being stronger than other people or winning majority approval. Freedom of expression leaves room for personal views, including dissent.

Fundamental rights appear at the beginning of the Basic Law and directly bind the state. This question does not ask you to list every freedom: it asks you to choose between four specific options. Article 5 expressly protects expression. The other answers concern weapons or imposing one’s will through power.

AI-generated scene of two neighbours talking calmly across a garden fence.
Disagreements can be discussed without force. Fictional AI-generated scene.

The other three answers

For each option, ask whether it protects a liberty or claims permission to use personal force.

Gun ownership

The Basic Law contains no specific fundamental right to own guns. Whether someone may possess particular weapons is a separate question governed by legislation. “Not a fundamental right” does not mean every form of possession is forbidden.

Law of the jungle

The rule of force means the stronger person prevails through physical power. This runs against resolving disputes under shared legal rules.

Vigilante justice

Vigilante justice means punishing others on one’s own authority. A suspicion does not turn a person into a court. Private punishment cannot replace legal proceedings.

Freedom of expression has legal limits.

Article 5(2) refers to general laws, protection of young people and personal honour. The right is therefore no blank cheque for threats or every insult. A particular statement must be assessed in context.

Legally regulated self-defence is also different from the rule of force or vigilante punishment. This question is not testing a self-defence situation. Its purpose is to identify an expressly protected fundamental right among the options.

Article 5 · Basic Law ↗
Your memory cue

Expressing a view: protected. Imposing force: no fundamental right.

Link expression with Article 5. “Faust” and “Selbstjustiz” point towards imposing one’s will or punishment personally.

Three words for this question

das Grundrechtfundamental right
A constitutionally protected right binding the state.
das Faustrechtthe rule of force
The stronger person imposes their will by force.
die Selbstjustizvigilante justice
Punishing others without legal authority.
Grundgesetz · Artikel 5 ↗
Put understanding into practice

One question understood. Ready for the next?

Practise all 310 questions for your state in our four free modes. No account needed. No advertising.

Optional: Plus for history, statistics and targeted revision. €4.99/month including VAT, renewing monthly.

Sources & context

An independently written study guide, not an official BAMF publication or advice for an individual case. The legal sources and explanations below were reviewed on 19 October 2026; the test question comes from the existing question bank.

Both pictures are AI-generated illustrations with fictional people and places. They do not document real events or official proceedings.