Try it for yourself
130Reading a ballot

Image 1 shows one clear first vote and one clear second vote.

Count the marks in each column. The two votes may support different parties.

About 4 min readReviewed: 20 October 2026
AI-generated open pencil tin with two plain pencils beside a completely blank sheet.
Federal Elections ActSections 34 and 39
Symbolic study still life without an official ballot.
The short answer

The ballot in image 1 is the correct answer.

Image 1 has one mark on the left for a constituency candidate and one on the right for a state list. Both choices are clear. The other images have multiple marks in one column and none in the other.

Try it for yourselfExam question · No. 130
Which ballot would be valid in a federal election?
Four numbered ballot excerpts: 1 has one mark on each side; 2 has two on the right and none on the left; 3 has two on the left and none on the right; 4 has three on the left and none on the right.
Unchanged image from the existing question bank. Numbers 1 to 4 correspond to the answer options.

Choose one answer. Your result stays on this page only.

Two votes do not mean two marks anywhere you like.

The first vote chooses a constituency candidate. The second selects a state list. In the existing image, the first-vote column is black on the left and the second-vote column blue on the right. What matters is that each type of vote has an unambiguous choice.

In image 1, the left mark is beside a CDU candidate and the right beside the SPD list. This is permitted and is called split-ticket voting. The marks need not be on the same row or for the same party.

Two fictional adults with a short straight dark bob and a bald head with a silver beard discuss a blank sheet at a study table.
AI-generated study explanation; the actual question image appears separately beside the exam question.

The other three answers

Check both columns separately in each incorrect image.

2

Image 2 shows two marks beside different lists on the right and none on the left. The second vote is therefore ambiguous; the first vote has not been cast.

3

Image 3 has two marks beside different candidates on the left and none on the right. The first vote does not identify one choice; the second vote is missing.

4

Image 4 has three marks on the left and none on the right. Selecting several candidates at once does not produce an unambiguous first vote; no second vote has been cast either.

One invalid vote does not always invalidate the other.

A voter may cast only one of the two votes. The uncast vote is then invalid, while the other may count if properly marked. Unclear markings are likewise assessed under electoral law. These four examples do not decide every possible ballot case.

The unchanged image comes from the existing question bank and shows excerpts bearing the 2021 federal-election date. It is not a template for someone’s current ballot. The clear-marking rule and permitted split-ticket voting explained here were checked against current rules.

Sections 34 and 39 · Federal Elections Act ↗
Your memory cue

One clear choice per vote. Image 1: one left, one right.

Do not confuse two types of vote with two arbitrary marks. Different parties are permitted; several simultaneous choices in the same column are different.

Three words for this question

der Stimmzettelballot paper
The official paper on which electoral choices are marked.
eindeutigunambiguous
Clear enough to identify the intended nomination.
das Stimmensplittingsplit-ticket voting
First and second votes support a candidate and list from different parties.
Bundeswahlgesetz · § 39 ↗
Put understanding into practice

One question understood. Ready for the next?

Practise all 310 questions for your state in our four free modes. No account needed. No advertising.

Optional: Plus for history, statistics and targeted revision. €4.99/month including VAT, renewing monthly.

Sources & context

An independently written study guide, not an official BAMF publication or advice for an individual case. The sources below were reviewed on 20 October 2026 for the claims explained here; the test question comes from the existing question bank.

The two editorial pictures are AI-generated illustrations. They do not document real events or official proceedings.The separate image beside the exam question is the unchanged file from the existing question bank, not an AI illustration.