Try it for yourself
276Respectful dealings with authorities

Poor treatment can be raised with the head of the authority.

Attending an appointment with an authority does not remove the right to ask for respectful treatment. A factual complaint is an established route.

About 4 min readReviewed: 20 October 2026
AI-generated blank notepaper with a plain pen and a blue folder.
Basic LawArticle 17 · Complaints
Symbolic preparation of a factual complaint, without an actual incident or personal information.
The short answer

I can complain to the head of the authority.

Someone wishing to raise concerns about an authority employee’s personal conduct can contact the responsible management or supervisory body. Such a complaint differs from a threat, and the person does not simply have to accept the treatment in silence.

Try it for yourselfExam question · No. 276
What should you do if you are treated badly by your contact person at a German authority?

Choose one answer. Your result stays on this page only.

Describe the conduct as specifically as possible.

Article 17 gives everyone the right to make written complaints to competent bodies. A complaint to the supervisory authority can address an employee’s personal misconduct. The responsible body is generally the supervisor or the authority’s management.

A clear account is useful: when did the incident happen, who was involved and what conduct is being challenged? A factual description makes the complaint assessable. It guarantees neither a particular outcome nor a specific personnel measure.

Two fictional adults with short curly and long light hair talk calmly at a table.
AI-generated conversation; no one is portrayed as an actual official or accused person.

The other three answers

The correct answer provides a factual way to respond.

I can't do anything.

It is incorrect to say that nothing can be done in principle. Responsible bodies exist to receive complaints.

I have to put up with this treatment.

Poor treatment does not simply have to be accepted without response. The complaint procedure is available.

I threaten the person.

A threat is not a proper complaint procedure and may itself have legal consequences. Criticism can be expressed without intimidation.

A conduct complaint does not stop an appeal deadline.

A complaint about official conduct concerns personal behaviour. It does not replace the appropriate objection or court action against a decision. Those deadlines generally continue to run, and a complaint does not automatically cancel the decision.

If the complaint concerns the manager personally, a higher body may be responsible. Particular officeholders are subject to special rules. The exam answer identifies the general route, not a complete competence rule for every authority.

Article 17 · Complaints · Basic Law ↗
Your memory cue

Challenge conduct: complaint. Challenge a decision: check the appropriate legal remedy.

Both concerns may arise together, but they follow different procedures.

Three words for this question

beanstandento raise an objection to
To point out conduct or a problem considered wrong.
die Dienstaufsichtofficial supervision
Supervision of employees’ official conduct.
der Rechtsbehelflegal remedy
An established procedure for obtaining legal review of a decision.
Grundgesetz · Artikel 17 ↗
Put understanding into practice

One question understood. Ready for the next?

Practise all 310 questions for your state in our four free modes. No account needed. No advertising.

Optional: Plus for history, statistics and targeted revision. €4.99/month including VAT, renewing monthly.

Sources & context

An independently written study guide, not an official BAMF publication or advice for an individual case. The sources below were reviewed on 20 October 2026 for the claims explained here; the test question comes from the existing question bank.

The two editorial pictures are AI-generated illustrations. They do not document real events or official proceedings.