Try it for yourself
283Reviewing official payment demands

Challenge an incorrect official payment demand.

The exam answer is an administrative objection. In practice, the instructions on legal remedies identify the procedure for the particular decision.

About 4 min readReviewed: 20 October 2026
AI-generated plain envelope and blue paper clip on a tray.
Code of Administrative Court ProcedureSection 70 · Objection
Symbolic official correspondence without an actual decision, amount or personal data.
The short answer

I file an objection with the authority.

Someone who considers an official demand incorrect should use the prescribed legal remedy. The question identifies an administrative objection. Simply setting the document aside or returning it does not clearly request legal review and may allow a deadline to expire.

Try it for yourselfExam question · No. 283
What do you do if you receive an incorrect bill from a German authority?

Choose one answer. Your result stays on this page only.

Turn a discrepancy into a specific request for review.

An official decision may explain the service for which a fee is charged and how it was calculated. Someone noticing a discrepancy should identify the decision and disputed point. An objection brings the decision into the prescribed review procedure.

Section 70 generally provides one month after notification and specified permitted forms of submission. A casual spoken expression of dissatisfaction is not automatically a valid objection. The instructions in the decision and applicable rules must be considered together.

Two fictional adults with long dark and short copper-coloured hair discuss blank papers.
AI-generated study discussion, not an actual legal-remedy procedure.

The other three answers

The incorrect answers confuse inaction or passing a document on with a legal remedy.

I leave the bill alone.

Setting it aside does not initiate review. It does not automatically invalidate the demand.

I send the bill back to the authority.

Simply returning it does not sufficiently explain which decision is to be legally reviewed. What matters is a validly submitted remedy.

I take the bill to the tax office.

The tax office is not generally responsible for every bill from another authority. The competent office depends on the demand and procedure.

The simplified question does not replace the instructions on remedies.

Not every official communication is an administrative act that can be challenged, and an objection procedure is not provided in every situation. Section 68 permits statutory exceptions. The exam answer must therefore not be read as a universal instruction for every bill or every state.

For public charges and costs, section 80 subsection 2 number 1 generally excludes suspensive effect. A payment obligation should therefore not be treated as suspended merely because an objection has been made. Possible suspension requires separate consideration.

Section 70 · Objection · Code of Administrative Court Procedure ↗
Your memory cue

Incorrect official demand: check the remedy and respond in time.

The question seeks “administrative objection”; the correct practical procedure depends on the particular decision.

Three words for this question

der Widerspruchadministrative objection
A legal remedy for reviewing an administrative decision where available.
die Rechtsbehelfsbelehrunginstructions on legal remedies
Instructions on the available remedy and how to submit it.
die aufschiebende Wirkungsuspensive effect
A legal effect temporarily preventing enforcement of a decision.
Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung · § 70 ↗
Put understanding into practice

One question understood. Ready for the next?

Practise all 310 questions for your state in our four free modes. No account needed. No advertising.

Optional: Plus for history, statistics and targeted revision. €4.99/month including VAT, renewing monthly.

Sources & context

An independently written study guide, not an official BAMF publication or advice for an individual case. The sources below were reviewed on 20 October 2026 for the claims explained here; the test question comes from the existing question bank.

The two editorial pictures are AI-generated illustrations. They do not document real events or official proceedings.