Try it for yourself
014Expression online

You can express your views online too.

An online post can express an opinion too. Question 014 applies Article 5 to digital life and distinguishes it from insults and prohibited symbols.

About 4 min readReviewed: 19 October 2026
AI-generated scene of a person writing a post on a laptop.
Basic LawArticle 5
Expression also has an everyday digital form. Fictional AI-generated scene.
The short answer

You can express your opinion on the internet.

Freedom of expression does not depend on speaking rather than posting. Article 5’s legal limits also apply online.

Try it for yourselfExam question · No. 014
Freedom of speech in Germany means, for example, that I …

Choose one answer. Your result stays on this page only.

The medium does not change the basic principle.

Question 001 concerns openly criticising government. This question names a specific medium: the internet. You might assess a policy in a post, argue for another solution or disagree with someone’s view.

Article 5 protects expression in speech, writing and images. A screen does not turn a lawful political opinion into prohibited speech. Conversely, it does not automatically make an unlawful statement permissible. Both the right and its legal limits remain relevant.

AI-generated scene of two adults looking at a tablet and discussing it.
Reading, considering and disagreeing. Fictional AI-generated scene.

The other three answers

Only one option describes an ordinary protected use of expression here.

may insult passers-by on the street.

Freedom of expression is not a general permission to insult anyone. Personal honour is protected, and insults can be criminal offences. Content and context matter.

may publicly display Nazi, Hamas, or Islamic State symbols.

Publicly wearing the prohibited symbols named is not a general fundamental right. Criminal and association law set limits. A blanket permission for Nazi, Hamas or Islamic State symbols is therefore wrong.

may only express my opinion as long as I don't contradict the government.

Article 5 also protects disagreement with government. The freedom would be hollow if only supportive views were permitted.

Rights, limits and context apply online.

The rules on symbols have statutory exceptions, including civic education, art, science and reporting on history or current events. A historical illustration is therefore not automatically assessed like wearing a symbol publicly in support. The exam option claims a general permission, which is wrong.

Freedom of expression also does not mean every private service must publish every contribution. The question tests the basic right to express views online. It does not determine a particular platform rule or a dispute about a deleted post.

Article 5 · Basic Law ↗
Your memory cue

Opinion online → protected. Online does not mean unlimited.

Look for the ordinary act of expressing a view. The other answers either claim excessive permission or require loyalty to government.

Three words for this question

äußernto express
To communicate a view in words, images or other forms.
widersprechento disagree
To express a different view.
das Kennzeichensymbol / identifying emblem
A sign that identifies an organisation.
Grundgesetz · Artikel 5 ↗
Put understanding into practice

One question understood. Ready for the next?

Practise all 310 questions for your state in our four free modes. No account needed. No advertising.

Optional: Plus for history, statistics and targeted revision. €4.99/month including VAT, renewing monthly.

Sources & context

An independently written study guide, not an official BAMF publication or advice for an individual case. The legal sources and explanations below were reviewed on 19 October 2026; the test question comes from the existing question bank.

Both pictures are AI-generated illustrations with fictional people and places. They do not document real events or official proceedings.