Try it for yourself
017Equality before the law

The state must not discriminate arbitrarily.

Comparable cases need equal standards. Question 017 asks about unjustified unequal treatment by the state, not a ban on criticism or petitions.

About 4 min readReviewed: 19 October 2026
AI-generated scene at a public-service counter with a staff member and a visitor.
Basic LawArticle 3
Government decisions require legal standards. Fictional AI-generated scene.
The short answer

The answer is unequal treatment by the state.

The catalogue answer concerns unlawful unequal treatment. Article 3 protects equality; differences with sufficient legal justification are not automatically forbidden.

Try it for yourselfExam question · No. 017
German laws prohibit …

Choose one answer. Your result stays on this page only.

Personal preferences are not a legal standard.

When two people submit applications, an authority cannot simply favour one because it prefers that person’s origin or beliefs. Government decisions must follow the applicable legal standards. Article 3 also identifies specific characteristics on which discrimination or preferential treatment must not be based.

The catalogue uses the broad term “unequal treatment”. For understanding it, the qualification “unlawful” matters. Equality does not require materially different situations always to be treated identically. It requires sufficient justification for distinctions and respect for specific discrimination prohibitions.

AI-generated scene of a varied study group discussing application papers.
Understanding equal rules and justified distinctions. Fictional AI-generated scene.

The other three answers

The first three options identify protected ways to participate in public life.

freedom of speech for residents.

Article 5 protects expression. Laws do not generally prohibit residents from expressing views. Legal limits on particular statements are a different matter.

petitions by citizens.

Article 17 gives everyone the right to address written requests or complaints to competent bodies and representative assemblies. A petition is not generally prohibited conduct.

freedom of assembly for residents.

Freedom of assembly is protected, not generally prohibited. Article 8 names peaceful, unarmed assemblies and expressly identifies Germans as its holders. Rules for a particular assembly are a separate issue.

Equality does not require identical outcomes.

Consider benefits whose statutory conditions depend on financial need. Different financial circumstances can justify different outcomes. That differs from deciding out of personal dislike for someone.

What counts as sufficient justification depends on the distinction and the rights affected. Any convenient pretext will not do. Article 3(1) also refers to all people, even though the exam option speaks here of citizens.

Article 3 · Basic Law ↗
Your memory cue

Equal treatment requires reasons, not arbitrariness.

Remember the exam answer without reading it as a ban on every legally justified distinction.

Three words for this question

die Ungleichbehandlungunequal treatment
Treating people or cases differently; the legal question is whether it is justified.
willkürlicharbitrary
Without sufficient objective justification.
die Petitionpetition
A written request or complaint to a competent public body or representative assembly.
Grundgesetz · Artikel 3 ↗
Put understanding into practice

One question understood. Ready for the next?

Practise all 310 questions for your state in our four free modes. No account needed. No advertising.

Optional: Plus for history, statistics and targeted revision. €4.99/month including VAT, renewing monthly.

Sources & context

An independently written study guide, not an official BAMF publication or advice for an individual case. The legal sources and explanations below were reviewed on 19 October 2026; the test question comes from the existing question bank.

Both pictures are AI-generated illustrations with fictional people and places. They do not document real events or official proceedings.