Try it for yourself
020Democracy & political parties

Dictatorship conflicts with a democratic constitution.

Parties may disagree and advocate change. Question 020 draws the line at a party seeking to replace democracy with dictatorship.

About 4 min readReviewed: 19 October 2026
AI-generated view of a bright civic meeting hall with a lectern and rows of seats.
Basic LawArticle 21
Space for democratic debate. Fictional AI-generated setting.
The short answer

The answer sought is: unconstitutional.

The aim of establishing a dictatorship conflicts with the democratic order of the Basic Law. Distinguish this exam answer from the separate legal decision on banning a party.

Try it for yourselfExam question · No. 020
A party in Germany pursues the goal of establishing a dictatorship. It is then …

Choose one answer. Your result stays on this page only.

Political competition needs shared ground rules.

In a democracy, parties compete for support. They may propose different taxes, changes to laws or a new government. That disagreement belongs to the political process. Article 21 describes the role of parties in forming political opinion.

Seeking to establish a dictatorship differs from an ordinary programme of reform. It attacks the democratic ground rules themselves. Article 20 establishes Germany as a democratic federal state and places the source of state authority in the people. The question asks you to recognise that conflict.

AI-generated scene of a public discussion involving three adults with varied appearances.
Different views within shared ground rules. Fictional AI-generated scene.

The other three answers

The other three words do not describe the aim of establishing dictatorship.

tolerant.

Tolerance leaves room for other convictions. Dictatorship instead removes basic opportunities for free political participation. “Tolerant” does not describe the stated aim.

oriented towards the rule of law.

Orientation towards the rule of law means binding public power to law and oversight. Establishing dictatorship conflicts with the democratic constitutional order protected here.

law-abiding.

Being law-abiding means respecting the existing legal order. Seeking to abolish the democratic constitutional order does not fit that description.

The exam answer does not automatically ban a party.

The Federal Constitutional Court decides whether a party is unconstitutional under Article 21(2). A government, an authority or this study page cannot simply replace that decision. The legal determination follows a separate procedure.

Under the judgment of 17 January 2017, an anti-constitutional aim alone is insufficient for a party ban. There must also be planned action against the protected order and significant concrete indications that it could succeed. Remember both points: the catalogue answer is “unconstitutional”; an actual ban requires the additional legal conditions and a court decision.

Article 21 · Basic Law ↗
Your memory cue

Seeking to abolish democracy → conflict with the constitution.

Separate the assessment of the stated aim from the procedure and conditions for banning a party.

Three words for this question

die Diktaturdictatorship
A form of rule without the free democratic oversight protected here.
verfassungswidrigunconstitutional
Incompatible with the constitution; for parties, the legal determination is reserved to the Federal Constitutional Court.
das Parteiverbotparty ban
A judicial measure subject to specific constitutional conditions.
Grundgesetz · Artikel 21 ↗
Put understanding into practice

One question understood. Ready for the next?

Practise all 310 questions for your state in our four free modes. No account needed. No advertising.

Optional: Plus for history, statistics and targeted revision. €4.99/month including VAT, renewing monthly.

Sources & context

An independently written study guide, not an official BAMF publication or advice for an individual case. The legal sources and explanations below were reviewed on 19 October 2026; the test question comes from the existing question bank.

Both pictures are AI-generated illustrations with fictional people and places. They do not document real events or official proceedings.