Try it for yourself
277Fair opportunities in recruitment

Being a mother is no substitute for assessing job suitability.

In the question, the woman is rejected solely because she is a mother. The task distinguishes prejudice from a factual selection process.

About 4 min readReviewed: 20 October 2026
AI-generated plain application folder beside a purple scarf on a table.
General Equal Treatment ActSection 7 · Non-discrimination
Symbolic preparation of an application without a real CV or personal data.
The short answer

She is refused the job solely because she is a mother.

The exam answer identifies blanket rejection because the applicant is a mother. Gender stereotypes, such as assuming that a mother is inherently unsuitable or unreliable, can constitute prohibited sex discrimination. The role’s requirements and actual suitability should be decisive.

Try it for yourselfExam question · No. 277
A woman with a two-year-old child applies for a job in Germany. What is an example of discrimination? She doesn't get the job only because she …

Choose one answer. Your result stays on this page only.

An assumption about a group does not assess this application.

The Equal Treatment Act also protects job applicants. The Federal Labour Court has explained that traditional role stereotypes in selection can directly concern sex, for example when only women are assumed to be less available because of childcare. Such an assumption does not replace assessment of the individual application.

The child’s age of two identifies the family situation in the question. It proves neither a lack of skills nor insufficient experience. Actual working hours and professional requirements may be relevant, but must be assessed without pretexts or discriminatory standards.

Two fictional adults with very short light and long silver hair discuss a plain folder.
AI-generated preparation conversation; parenthood or professional position is not inferred from the image.

The other three answers

The other reasons can be relevant, but are not unrestricted excuses.

doesn't speak English.

English skills may be required for a role. Such a requirement must relate to the work and must not be a pretext.

has too high salary expectations.

Different salary expectations may prevent agreement on a contract. That differs from blanket rejection because someone is a mother.

has no experience in this profession.

Professional experience may be a legitimate selection criterion. Whether it is required and genuinely missing must be assessed against the particular role.

Parenthood and sex are not the same legal characteristic.

Parenthood and caring responsibilities are not listed as separate grounds in section 1 of the Act. Protection in this context may arise particularly through sex discrimination. Not every disadvantage affecting all parents therefore automatically falls under exactly the same rule.

The specific statutory concept of maternity in connection with pregnancy and childbirth must not simply be extended to every later stage of parenthood. Particular claims, evidence and deadlines require individual assessment; the exam answer does not create an automatic right to be hired.

Section 7 · Non-discrimination · General Equal Treatment Act ↗
Your memory cue

Assess suitability, rather than assume gender roles.

The word “solely” matters: in the exam, the rejection is based only on being a mother.

Three words for this question

die Eignungsuitability
The abilities and qualifications appropriate for a task.
das Rollenbildrole stereotype
A social expectation about the tasks a group is supposed to undertake.
vorgeschobena pretext
Given as a justification although another reason is decisive.
Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz · §§ 1, 3, 6–8 und 15 ↗
Put understanding into practice

One question understood. Ready for the next?

Practise all 310 questions for your state in our four free modes. No account needed. No advertising.

Optional: Plus for history, statistics and targeted revision. €4.99/month including VAT, renewing monthly.

Sources & context

An independently written study guide, not an official BAMF publication or advice for an individual case. The sources below were reviewed on 20 October 2026 for the claims explained here; the test question comes from the existing question bank.

The two editorial pictures are AI-generated illustrations. They do not document real events or official proceedings.