Try it for yourself
278Participation in working life

A wheelchair does not determine someone’s accounting ability.

The question gives wheelchair use as the sole reason for rejection. This blanket exclusion is the discrimination example sought.

About 4 min readReviewed: 20 October 2026
AI-generated plain calculator with a dark unmarked display beside a closed folder.
General Equal Treatment ActSection 1 · Protection from discrimination
Symbolic accounting work without real figures, accounts or application data.
The short answer

He is refused the job solely because he uses a wheelchair.

Disability must not automatically be equated with lack of occupational suitability. The Equal Treatment Act also protects applicants. In the question, the accountant’s professional ability is not assessed; wheelchair use alone is made the reason for exclusion.

Try it for yourselfExam question · No. 278
A man in a wheelchair has applied for a job as an accountant. What is an example of discrimination? He doesn't get the job only because he …

Choose one answer. Your result stays on this page only.

The role’s requirements are the relevant standard.

Relevant professional knowledge may matter for an accounting role. Whether someone has that knowledge cannot be determined from their wheelchair. Fair selection examines the actual tasks and abilities rather than treating a visible mobility aid as an automatic limit.

Equal participation may also require identifying barriers. An accessible room or suitable workplace arrangement concerns the environment, not a person’s value or competence. This learning example does not assert a particular individual entitlement to specific equipment.

A fictional adult with long light hair sits in a wheelchair and explains something to a person with short copper-coloured hair at a table.
AI-generated conversation between equals, not an actual recruitment process or health record.

The other three answers

Factual selection criteria must fit the particular role.

has no experience.

A lack of relevant experience may matter. It must genuinely be required and must not simply be a pretext for rejection because of disability.

has too high salary expectations.

A large difference in salary expectations can prevent agreement. That is different from the blanket exclusion described in the question.

doesn't speak English.

English skills may be required depending on the tasks. An arbitrary language requirement unnecessary for the work would not be a convincing factual standard.

Equal treatment means neither blanket exclusion nor automatic hiring.

Section 8 permits certain distinctions only under limited conditions, such as an essential and determining occupational requirement with a legitimate purpose and proportionate application. Simply identifying a disability is not enough.

The Act can provide compensation or damages claims. Under section 15(6), a breach alone does not create a right to the employment contract. Whether a particular case is discriminatory and what steps are available requires separate assessment.

Section 1 · Protection from discrimination · General Equal Treatment Act ↗
Your memory cue

Wheelchair use does not disprove professional competence.

Focus on the sole reason for rejection and distinguish it from genuine job requirements.

Three words for this question

das Hilfsmittelassistive device
An object that supports an activity or movement.
die Barrierebarrier
An obstacle making access or participation harder.
die Buchhaltungaccounting
The systematic recording and handling of financial business transactions.
Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz · § 1 ↗
Put understanding into practice

One question understood. Ready for the next?

Practise all 310 questions for your state in our four free modes. No account needed. No advertising.

Optional: Plus for history, statistics and targeted revision. €4.99/month including VAT, renewing monthly.

Sources & context

An independently written study guide, not an official BAMF publication or advice for an individual case. The sources below were reviewed on 20 October 2026 for the claims explained here; the test question comes from the existing question bank.

The two editorial pictures are AI-generated illustrations. They do not document real events or official proceedings.