Try it for yourself
289Fair recruitment decisions

A job application must not be rejected because of skin colour.

The question gives four possible reasons. Skin colour directly identifies racial discrimination in the selection described.

About 4 min readReviewed: 20 October 2026
AI-generated simply set table with two water glasses and folded napkins.
General Equal Treatment ActSection 7 · Non-discrimination
Symbolic hospitality setting, not an actual restaurant or recruitment process.
The short answer

Because he has dark skin.

Rejection solely because of dark skin is racial discrimination. The General Equal Treatment Act also protects job applicants. Suitability for the particular work must be assessed using permissible criteria.

Try it for yourselfExam question · No. 289
A man with dark skin applies for a job as a waiter in a restaurant in Germany. What is an example of discrimination? He doesn't get the job only because …

Choose one answer. Your result stays on this page only.

The question asks why the applicant is rejected.

Service work may require particular knowledge and skills. Skin colour says nothing about them. If it alone determines the outcome, a person is treated worse because of a protected characteristic instead of being assessed on suitability.

Protection against discrimination does not begin only after hiring. Section 6 expressly includes job applications. A privately run restaurant is therefore not free to use racist selection criteria.

Two fictional adults with long dark and short light hair talk at a table.
AI-generated discussion between equals, without a real application or claim about the people’s origins.

The other three answers

The other reasons can be relevant, but do not permit arbitrary rejection.

his German skills are too low.

Sufficient language skills may be needed for particular tasks. The requirement must fit the work; excessive or pretextual language demands can themselves discriminate.

he has too high salary expectations.

Different salary expectations may prevent agreement. That is not in itself racial discrimination, but must not disguise a decision actually based on race.

he has no experience in the profession.

Work experience can be an objective selection criterion where relevant to the particular role and applied fairly. Skin colour does not establish experience.

Even neutral wording needs a lawful basis.

Section 3 also covers indirect discrimination: a seemingly neutral rule may particularly disadvantage protected groups. It then requires the objective justification specified by law. The exam does not claim every language or experience requirement is automatically permissible.

Unlawful rejection can give rise to claims. However, section 15 subsection 6 does not automatically create a right to be hired. Evidence, deadlines and possible claims require separate assessment in a real case.

Section 7 · Non-discrimination · General Equal Treatment Act ↗
Your memory cue

Assess skills; do not use skin colour as a reason for exclusion.

The decisive word is “because”: what reason actually caused the rejection?

Three words for this question

die Bewerbungjob application
Seeking a particular job.
die Eignungsuitability
Skills and qualifications matching the particular work.
mittelbare Benachteiligungindirect discrimination
Particular disadvantage caused by seemingly neutral rules without sufficient justification.
Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz · §§ 1, 3, 6–8 und 15 ↗
Put understanding into practice

One question understood. Ready for the next?

Practise all 310 questions for your state in our four free modes. No account needed. No advertising.

Optional: Plus for history, statistics and targeted revision. €4.99/month including VAT, renewing monthly.

Sources & context

An independently written study guide, not an official BAMF publication or advice for an individual case. The sources below were reviewed on 20 October 2026 for the claims explained here; the test question comes from the existing question bank.

The two editorial pictures are AI-generated illustrations. They do not document real events or official proceedings.